Information

Pixhawk 2 User Group

Provide a place to discuss the development of firmware and accessory hardware for the Pixhawk 2 stand alone navigation controller.

Members: 276
Latest Activity: Apr 16

Discussion Forum

Pixhawk 2 - board damaged (maybe) from factory

Started by Robert Baumgartner. Last reply by Robert Baumgartner Apr 16. 6 Replies

Dears,After spent more than 2 weeks troubleshooting an error "No GPS" message. (and “destroy” others GPSs, cables and oterhs, to try to understand)I opened my Pixhawk2  board and found hot "glue"…Continue

Pixhawk + Here+ - With Rover stand alone

Started by Robert Baumgartner. Last reply by Robert Baumgartner Apr 12. 7 Replies

Hi,I m a little bit confused , can I have my Pixhawk and Here+ working without the base GPS ? only with the Rover ?RegardsContinue

HIL mode in Mission Planner 1.3.53 not working for PIXHAWK 2

Started by Dexter Doc Apr 12. 0 Replies

I have been looking for testing using HIL mode before actual flight. But HIL firmware is not available on download on Mission Planner 1.3.53 and below. Error prompts that bad firmware. request advice…Continue

Mission Planner/PixHawk 2.1 log dates are for 1999

Started by Jon Turner. Last reply by Jon Turner Jan 27. 4 Replies

I am still learning the software, but all my logs after the new year show to be 1999. How do I change the time/date settings?Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Pixhawk 2 User Group to add comments!

Comment by Aaron on May 17, 2016 at 12:30pm

Building a fixed wing long range mapper. Curious what the Pixhawk 2 will bring? Support for multiple camera systems, basic on-board processing, running dual GNSS? Any confirmed dates for release?

Respectfully 

Comment by Senyao Lian on May 16, 2016 at 11:44pm

I download a set of code iCGS on github ,but it can't run in Xcode.who have the code about UAV ,please contact me ,thank you!!!


Developer
Comment by Jani Hirvinen on April 4, 2016 at 4:50pm

NOTE!  WE HAVE MOVED! ==============================================

We now have a new shiny discussion and support forum for ArduPilot, Pixhawk, Linux and supporting projects at http://discuss.ardupilot.org.

Please come visit us there for all things ArduPilot. We look forward to seeing you.

Full announcement @ here

Comment by DG on March 26, 2016 at 9:11am

Any new information?


Developer
Comment by Philip on March 10, 2016 at 8:33pm
Hi Richard
Key advantages are, built in vibration isolation, heated IMU, modular, redundant power and additional sensors.
Comment by Richard Kennedy on March 10, 2016 at 4:11pm

Thomas [ or anyone ] what is expected to be advantageous for the pix 2 compared to the pix 1? thx

Comment by Phil Horner on February 26, 2016 at 6:48pm

By New Zealand standards, that's Spidezilla!


Developer
Comment by Philip on February 26, 2016 at 6:39pm
By Australian standards, that's not a big spider....

Admin
Comment by Thomas J Coyle III on February 26, 2016 at 1:50pm

@Fnoop Dogg,

That is just the FCU removed from its carrier board. It is a very compact flight controller by itself, but is about the same size as a PH1 when attached to its carrier board.

Regards,

Tom C AVD

Comment by Fnoop on February 26, 2016 at 1:36pm

Is that a tiny tiny tiny pixhawk2..

or a FECKING GIANT SPIDER?!!!

 
 
 

Groups

Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest 
A list of all T3 contests is here. The current round, the Vertical Horizontal one, is here

© 2018   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service