Information

Pixhawk 2 User Group

Provide a place to discuss the development of firmware and accessory hardware for the Pixhawk 2 stand alone navigation controller.

Members: 262
Latest Activity: May 18

Discussion Forum

More info on Here GPS?

Started by MikeRover. Last reply by Miquel Garcia May 8. 7 Replies

Just noticed that the "GPS of choice" for the Pixhawk 2 now appears to be "Here", and that there's an RTK version.  Is there any doco on these?  In particular the RTK?Continue

Good source for connectors and cables?

Started by Grant Petty. Last reply by Simon L. May 8. 11 Replies

I'm working on getting my new Pixhawk2 up and running in an RC plane, and I keep running into the problem that I don't have specific connectors or cables for making connections between the various…Continue

What is Pixhawk 2?

Started by Philip. Last reply by Amit Mar 27. 143 Replies

www.pixhawk2.comPixhawk 2 is a small cube, with a 38.5mm square footprint.All connection to the cube is via a DF17 connector coming out the bottom of the…Continue

Starting PID Values for Larger Quads

Started by Tyler Troutt. Last reply by Vesselin Goranov Dec 21, 2016. 5 Replies

I am being told that my problem with my quad lies within the control loops of the flight controller. That being said I am not able to fly my quad to tune it. So where do you start with tuning. Before…Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Pixhawk 2 User Group to add comments!

Comment by Aaron on May 17, 2016 at 12:30pm

Building a fixed wing long range mapper. Curious what the Pixhawk 2 will bring? Support for multiple camera systems, basic on-board processing, running dual GNSS? Any confirmed dates for release?

Respectfully 

Comment by Senyao Lian on May 16, 2016 at 11:44pm

I download a set of code iCGS on github ,but it can't run in Xcode.who have the code about UAV ,please contact me ,thank you!!!


Developer
Comment by Jani Hirvinen on April 4, 2016 at 4:50pm

NOTE!  WE HAVE MOVED! ==============================================

We now have a new shiny discussion and support forum for ArduPilot, Pixhawk, Linux and supporting projects at http://discuss.ardupilot.org.

Please come visit us there for all things ArduPilot. We look forward to seeing you.

Full announcement @ here

Comment by DG on March 26, 2016 at 9:11am

Any new information?


Developer
Comment by Philip on March 10, 2016 at 8:33pm
Hi Richard
Key advantages are, built in vibration isolation, heated IMU, modular, redundant power and additional sensors.
Comment by Richard Kennedy on March 10, 2016 at 4:11pm

Thomas [ or anyone ] what is expected to be advantageous for the pix 2 compared to the pix 1? thx

Comment by Phil Horner on February 26, 2016 at 6:48pm

By New Zealand standards, that's Spidezilla!


Developer
Comment by Philip on February 26, 2016 at 6:39pm
By Australian standards, that's not a big spider....

Admin
Comment by Thomas J Coyle III on February 26, 2016 at 1:50pm

@Fnoop Dogg,

That is just the FCU removed from its carrier board. It is a very compact flight controller by itself, but is about the same size as a PH1 when attached to its carrier board.

Regards,

Tom C AVD

Comment by Fnoop on February 26, 2016 at 1:36pm

Is that a tiny tiny tiny pixhawk2..

or a FECKING GIANT SPIDER?!!!

 
 
 

© 2017   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service