All Posts (14049)

Sort by

3D Printed Quad Video

I have had my 3D printed quad finished for a while now.  I have been working on a 3D printed tricopter, anti-vibration mounts, gimbals and some other fun stuff.  I finally buckled down and put a short video together of some print time-lapses and some videos of the quad in the air.  She flies very well with an old kk Blackboard but I would like to add an APM or a Naza onto it.  

Read more…
3D Robotics

3689539367?profile=original

Our all-star interns have been brewing up some cool devices this summer at 3DR. Three words: Oculus Rift FPV.  

We have the Oculus communicating through the Mission Planner as a joystick input, driving the pan/tilt servo gimbal on our Skyhunter fixed-wing aircraft. Video is piped to the ground via standard 5.8GHz TX/RX gear, with the 3DR OSD kit in line. The end result is one for which you should stay firmly seated; even without the video stretched all the way to the periphery, the experience is incredibly immersive.

Our current setup is based on monocular video, but stayed tuned for more from Project Warg, including stereoscopic video, new airframes, and closed-loop aircraft control with the Oculus!

Read more…

Stereoscopic FPV flying

This is a video I found of 3D video recording, but it got me thinking about 3D FPV flying. Especially with Team Blacksheep kind-of flying, close to the ground or obstacles like trees, surely stereo viewing must add a lot and help determine distances. Is anyone doing this and is it worthwhile? Haven't got my Fat Sharks that long yet, but start thinking how it must be nice to fly with stereoscopic glasses and dual cam of course.

3689539353?profile=original

Read more…
Moderator

Cracker Barrel Does TED

3689539244?profile=original
Patrick from sUAS News recently had a spot at TEDx Sacramento. All part of our ongoing effort to change public misconceptions about our industry, and to highlight beneficial applications of non-militarized systems. While some folks practice their presentations for months the Cracker Barrel and Patrick were last minute entries into the program, but all’s well that ends well.

Read more…

Filmed an end-to-end flight using my Panasonic GH3 on a tripod showing my Mac ground station (running Parallels) and using a GoPro HD Hero3 BE on the copter. The GoPro was just velcro'd to the copter frame, which is obviously not ideal. But these are just initial flight tests, so I'm not concerned with video quality. I'm so excited about the prospects for this kind of semi-guided flight, and I'm looking forward to more like this!

Read more…
3D Robotics

3689539200?profile=originalCongrats to Aeromau on this great coverage from Gizmag!

While we’re seeing an increasing amount of aerial mapping being performed by purpose-built drone aircraft, a lot of people are no doubt still leery of remotely-piloting what is essentially a little airplane. With such people in mind, Canada’s Aeromao has recently released its Aeromapper X5. The drone is launched by hand, flies and takes photos autonomously, then parachutes back down to the ground.

The Aeromapper is a modified version of the already-available Skywalker X5 Flying Wing, a remote-control foam-bodied UAV. Designed for FPV (First Person View) flight, the Skywalker has a built-in “cargo bay” of sorts, for the installation of a user-supplied camera.

Aeromao has taken that UAV and added features such as carbon fiber reinforcement rods, an Ardupilot Mega 2.6 autopilot, an air-to-ground telemetry system, a landing parachute, and a ground-facing 24-megapixelSony NEX 7 camera with a pancake lens.

After programming in the coordinates of the geographical area that they wish to map, users just start the Aeromapper up and throw it into the air. It proceeds to fly in a grid pattern over the area, snapping geo-tagged shots at regular intervals as it goes. When the job is done, the plane returns to its take-off point, at which point its engine cuts out and the chute is deployed. During take-off and landing, the camera is protected by a door in the belly of the aircraft, that opens only while mapping is taking place.

When the job is done, the plane returns to its take-off point, at which point its engine c...

The Aeromapper has a wingspan of 1.18 meters (46.5 in), weighs 1.4 kg (3 lb), and has a maximum cruising speed of 50 km/h (31 mph). One charge of its four 2,200-mAh batteries should be good for 25 to 30 minutes of flight. It can fly in winds blowing at up to 35 km/h (22 mph), and has an autonomous-mode range of 20 km (12 miles) – it can also be manually operated by radio control, but at a shorter range.

It’s an impressive little beast, although one that isn’t aimed at the casual hobbyist – a complete Aeromapper X5 package is priced at 4,700 CAD (about US$4,576).

The drone can be seen in action in the video below.

Read more…

3689539267?profile=original

 

 

 

 

USA

 
Hi All-

Steve Marolt from SteadiDrone USA with an update. Wanted to let you all know that SD USA is up and running and selling our QU4D, H6X, and EI8HT like crazy. The demand has been quite simply overwhelming! And we are grateful! Especially with our QU4D, we have worked through some of the minor issues related to the introduction of the model to arrive at what I believe is the ultimate quad multi that will be around setting the "corolla" standard for years to come. It is by far the most durable, compact, transportable quad on the market today. They have been used from coast to mountain tops all over the world and are now setting a performance record that will establish the model well into the future as a reliable workhorse. SD USA is now fully stocked and able to service our customers in sales and support. Drop us a line at info@steadidroneusa.com (mailto:info@steadidroneusa.com) or visit our website at steadidroneusa.com and take a look. Feel free to call us at 970-300-2603 to chat-we will pick up the phone!

A SteadiDrone dealership USA

www.SteadiDroneUSA.com

info@SteadiDroneUSA.com

Tele: 01-970-300-4749

Cell: 01-970-379-7047

 

All the best!

Steve Marolt

Owner/Director

SteadiDrone USAundefinedundefined

Read more…

3689539161?profile=original

While preparing for our vacation in North Carolina, I packed my lightweight inexpensive HD camera quad, hoping to get some interesting video and still shots. Unfortunately, a hard landing early in the week caused one of the blades to bend, and I forgot to pack spares. Thankfully, with my little quad, the blades are lightweight plastic, and easily bend back into shape, allowing it to be flown again almost immediately. Unfortunately, the bent blade led to jello on any videos I took the rest of the week.  But, I did manage to capture some still shots at a little park where we stopped one day. My son loved the train, and I loved taking a some shots of the train. If you look in the lower left corner of the picture, you can see part of the HeliStorm family as well.

While flying on my vacation, I imagined what my son or daughter might have at their disposal when they take their families on vacation someday. I can envision a time when small lightweight UAS are carried around in much the same way pro-sumer cameras are today. Easily controlled, these, "personal drones," will become invaluable to the amateur photographer, and it will not seem unusual to pull out a cellphone sized flying camera, get a few cool aerial shots, and be on your way. I think larger UAS will have their place in commercial applications, but I also think we have yet to envision what people will develop as the technology becomes smaller, smarter, better, and cheaper.

If you would like to see a few other aerial shots from my vacation, and read some more of my late night ramblings, you can check out my webpage here.

Thanks for reading!

Read more…
3D Robotics

3689539202?profile=originalFrom the Lifeline Drones website:

Lifeline Drones is a cost effective and scalable series of custom designed networked 3-D printed drones.

With a payload of 3 kilograms, the drones can carry lab samples and medications to areas that are normally hard to reach in the event of a medical emergency, natural disaster, or in areas where there is limited road access.

They'll be presenting at this year's Open Hardware Summit at MIT on September 6th.

Read more…

Airframe Wing Project





PX31 is a 44inch large wing with a payload of 150g-200g using a external pod its one of the earlier models I used as demonstrator mainly as a simple FPV drone

One of the highlights is its structure. Likewise this wing takes a lot of beating
http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2013/093/e/a/px31_abuse_testing_of_the_airframe_by_synersignart-d60a86q.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5GLKnINwCQ&feature=c4-overview&list=UUr8HxcdLWVlo-Rj2WV0yTSQ

its the same wing that took down a fellow flyer's 330Quad in a drone to drone midair collision. and you think the multirotor would turn the plane into confetti.   

this is a tough nut size for size category and its still classified as a foamy .

PX32
the mini wing like its big brother its just as tough but this small plane is as good as a toy.
just 24inch WS


https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=aZkQ6IrEG-c

PX33
WS 36inch
AUW 500g-600g
Payload of 150g-200g
payload bay 5x7x1

the latest in the fleet , perfect for those FPV , Drone Project .
optional is additional wing compartment or external pods 



Read more…

3689539081?profile=original

Northrop Grumman Corporation  is sponsoring a team of high school students from Dickson College who are competing in the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Outback Challenge 2013, aimed at promoting UAVs and demonstrating their vehicles in civilian applications.

As part of the UAV Challenge the students will develop their own UAV. They are required to design, build and fly a UAV capable of delivering life-saving supplies to a lost or injured individual, known as Outback Joe. The team must locate Outback Joe using clues and waypoints, and deliver the payload as close to him as possible. Dickson College students develop a number of vehicles based on the PX4 architecture in Ardurover, Arduplane and Arducopter configurations. 

"The UAV Challenge requires students to apply their combined skills and knowledge of robotics, computing and mathematics as they attempt to develop an unmanned airborne delivery system," said the Hon Dr Mike Kelly AM, MP, Australian Minister for Defence Materiel. "These are real-life professional skills which are being developed and honed and I am very pleased to see industry playing a leading role in supporting these types of initiatives."

Northrop Grumman participates in a number of educational programs in countries around the world that are aimed at promoting science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. The partnership with Dickson College is the first long-term commitment made by the company to foster STEM efforts in Australia.

"This is a great opportunity to mentor tomorrow's leaders in aerospace and other technical career fields and to help create a future generation of aerospace professionals with a focus on UAVs," said Ian Irving, chief executive, Australia for Northrop Grumman. "Forging this partnership with Dickson College provides students with tangible ways to explore and develop their field of interest -- whether that is engineering, mathematics, science or project management."

In addition to providing the funding for the Dickson College team to begin development of their UAV, Northrop Grumman executives and employees will also meet with the students to provide key insights about their progress.

"We are delighted to have Northrop Grumman's support for our UAV program, " said Rob Emanuel, principal of Dickson College. "This partnership between industry and education is vitally important to us and enables us to provide exciting and challenging opportunities for our students to work with cutting-edge technology and understand the opportunities that exist for them once they graduate."

The UAV Challenge has been developed to promote the significance of UAVs to Australia. The event is a joint government, industry and research organization initiative between the Queensland government and the Australian Research Centre for Aerospace Automation, Aviation Development Australia and the Aerial Unmanned Vehicle Systems of Australia. Please visit http://www.uavoutbackchallenge.com.au/ for more information.

About Dickson College

Dickson College is a year 11 and 12 public school located in Canberra, Australia. The school offers a wide range of learning opportunities including industry focused science, engineering and technology programs. Please visit www.dicksonc.act.edu.au or andrew.moss@ed.act.edu.au for more information.

Read more…

Techpod High Altitude Flight Test

ConservationDrones.org tested the vertical limit of the Techpod in open ocean and 30-40 km per hour wind conditions. We were aiming to reach 1 km above sea level. But the motor gave up at 700 m, from where the APM guided the Techpod down extremely well. During an attempted manual landing (on Stabilize mode), it crashed into a mangrove tree with damage only to the motor mount. Motor was completely burned out though.

Airframe: Techpod (2.5 m wing span)
All-Up-Weight: about 2.5 kg
Motor: Turnigy 3536 1000 kv
Propeller: 11 x 6
Battery: 2 x 5000 mAh Turnigy
Autopilot: APM 2.5+
Telemetry modems: RDF900 (ground station) & 3DR (onboard)

Read more…
Admin

3689538836?profile=original

The lagging federal effort to fully integrate drones into U.S. airspace is in danger of falling even further behind schedule.

A funding bill now before the Senate essentially would stop the process in its tracks by prohibiting the Federal Aviation Administration from moving forward until it completes a detailed report on drones’ potential privacy impact.

The report, called for in the Senate’s fiscal 2014 transportation appropriations measure, would be yet another hurdle in the FAA’s already complex, time-consuming drone integration initiative.

The agency has been charged by Congress to write rules and regulations allowing drones — now used primarily by the military, law enforcement and researchers — to operate commercially in U.S. skies by September 2015, but the industry fears that deadline is likely to be missed.

Requiring the FAA, which traditionally deals only with airspace safety and has little experience in writing Fourth Amendment protections, to craft a comprehensive privacy report would all but guarantee the date will be pushed back.

Leaders in the unmanned aerial systems sector warn that such setbacks will hamper American technological innovation and carry economic consequences.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jul/28/funding-schemes-in-congress-could-ground-drones/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS#ixzz2aQcXgU5Q

Read more…

Marine Conservation Drones

ConservationDrones.org went to Glover's Reef in Belize upon the invitation of the Belize Fisheries Department and Wildlife Conservation Society. We explored the use of our drones for supporting enforcement of marine conservation areas.

Glover's Reef is about 50 km offshore with winds of 30-40 km per hour. We flew a modified version of the Techpod (thanks, Wayne!) and a custom-made Wing. Both did extremely well in the winds.

The Techpod made a failed attempt to climb to 1 km above sea level. Its motor burned out at 700 m, but APM glided it down to a 20x20 m landing spot in gusty winds! (We will post that story soon.)

We collected over 40 GB of video footage, which is being edited. This is just a sneak peek.

Read more…

Autonomy!

I just got a 3DR quad with APM2.5+ with GPS, and I was itching to try out the mission planner and its ability to program a mission with GPS. Here's a video of my first successful flight!


I'm a pretty experienced multirotor guy with an xproheli xp2 and a Cinestar 8, but these are flown the old fashioned way. :-)

Read more…

Ghetto fpv Quadcopter

  1. fSNK95p.jpg?width=320
    Ok, so in my last post, I wrote about making a video recording quadcopter using an 808 #16 keychain camera and a cheap toy quadcopter, the WLtoys v929. Quadcopter recording is great. I have had many adventures recording at places ranging from my local woods, to Donnington Race track in the UK.
     
    Anyway, my point being, once I had the flying bug, that is, once I learned not to crash anymore, I wanted to hack what I had, more. I learned that the 808 #16 camera allows video-out through it's usb port, and by mashing together a simple transmitter and receiver I could send and receive video to a screen. So, in effect I could fly FPV (first person view). It works great and I feel like I have experienced what it is like to fly, and learn-to-fly an aircraft. It's a strange feeling flying something that is out of sight, and it takes calm nerves and trust of your gadget creation skills. Things you need to know are, the quadcopter and controller use the 2.4ghz radio band which is the same as wifi. This means, parts are readily available and cheap. The video uses 5.8ghz radio band. The two bands are not the same as each other to help prevent cross frequency interference. Long-range radio frequencies are lower frequencies, i.e 1.3ghz, 900mhz. However, we will be using less expensive, higher frequency gear, and improve them with better antennas. We have a limited weight allowance with which to load the quadcopter before it becomes unable to take off, so we have to be very lean with materials. I estimate the lift allowance to be around 25-27grammes. What you will have at the end of this project is an fpv-ready quadcopter that will have greater range than the 'cheap' sub £250 quadcopters, and with better video quality, HD recording, cheap replaceable parts if broken, and modular parts that can be used on other gear (planes, cars, bird nest monitoring, etc). I figure that getting an fpv quadcopter, including controller, batteries and go-pro camera will cost about a grand. Ours will cost about a hundred pounds.



    So here's a run down on the parts:
     
    -I use a cheap 7" monitor from ebay that works great = £12

    -3S 11.1v 3800mah lipo to power the monitor (secondhand but pristine condition = £6). Although the 2s 1300mah lipo powered the monitor perfectly fine for an hour as I timed it. So the 3800mah 3s is plenty.
    RC305 RX again from ebay = £15
    - 2s 7.2v 1300mah lipo for the RC305 = £5
    - Both of these have been attached to the back of the monitor using velcro sticky strip (£1 per metre)
    - I trimmed all cables as short as I wished on the monitor, and the RC305 cable lost it's 2 audio cables, leaving only video.
    - Camera 808 #16 wide angle from ebay = £28

    - hacked up an old mini usb cable to get the plug and used only pin 2. I used this for video out instead of trying to solder a single wire to the camera board pin 2. As this seemed too fiddly at present. And I want to use the 808 camera as bike mount and hat mount cam, so I wish not to butcher it.
    TX5823 200mw 5.8ghx module from ebay = £15

    - Tx uses a N4001 diode to reduce the 3.7-4.2v of the lipo, to 3.3v that the TX requires - preventing it from burning out.
    RG316 pigtail with RPSMA connectors. Hacked this up to make an antenna, soldered outer shield cable to ground, centre cable to antenna. Have enough left over for several cloverleaf/helical antennas in future. = £2
    - Using tiny 3.7v 1s lipo that I use for both the 808 camera & Tx. ebay = 3pack £2.50
    - the tx, lipo, 808 all use a combination of micro jst connectors that I bought (male & female 10xpack) on ebay for £1.50 - not the normal red jst connectors. I want to use this at present so I can easily change the lipo if it runs out, and use the tx module on another RC vehicle, or use a cheap 520tvl camera later on if I wish.
    There has been lots of trimming & soldering wires as short as they can go, trimming and soldering coaxial is a chore.
    Battery charging - I'm using the v929 1s charger for the 1s lipo, and cheap B3 balance charger for 2s & 3s Lipos (ebay £4)

    Price rundown (What I paid):

    monitor = £12
    3s lipo = £6
    2s lipo = £5
    RC305 Rx = £15
    Velcro strip = £1
    808 #16 camera = £28
    TX5823 = £15
    5x N4001 diodes = £1
    RG316 pigtail = £2
    1s 3.7v lipo x3 = £2.50
    micro jst connectors = £1.50
    Balance charger = £4
    V929 quadcopter & 2.4ghz controller = £26
    Total = £119



    Early build stages:


    setting up the transmitter, soldering & glueing the transmitter, building a tiny antenna...
    XoYk8uR.jpg?width=226
    Early mounting idea (note transmitter has not got the finished antenna yet)
    fSNK95p.jpg?width=320
    Added a Diode to reduce the battery voltage slightly to prevent the transmitter from burning out.
    QJ5hC3W.jpg?width=320
    Built a tiny circularly-polarized antenna for the transmitter, which enables 360 degree coverage, and much less static & dropout. I used this wire.
    CD6A8Qc.jpg?width=189
    figured out the best way to mount the monitor to the controller as best as I could. I used some old single-ply wood from the shed, and cut it up. Nothing too fancy, wanted to keep it ghetto. Used some old foam board as a sunlight hood - attached with velcro.
    bRCr0kn.jpg?width=320
    Painted the monitor hood black, and sealed out any light from creeping in and affecting image quality using black vinyl tape. Damn sunlight...
    dGNe2Fo.jpg?width=320
    I tested the video range using the scientific method of placing the quadcopter on a tree stump and walking as far as I could with the monitor/controller, before the video picture signal dropped out. I managed fairly well on first try. Better to know the limits before launching :)
    C029S8w.jpg?width=320
    Eventually, after several cheaply repaired crashes, I learned to fly using only the monitor, which is a weird feeling, and can cause panic at first. This was my practice loop which I have now mastered, and I'm flying over trees and buildings without worrying too much...
    Cd5LBwt.jpg?width=320
    I eventually taught myself to build a helical antenna using the base of a pringles can, some copper wire, a piece of scrap/leftover plywood, and some solder and hotglue. Range almost doubled. I am guessing, but I think I get about 600m radius. Might have to walk the range test again....
    J6jZ0X5.jpg?width=320
    I added some push switches, as I was finding it stresssful to get setup by fiddling with wires and plugs, and then attempting to take off. It worked, because I lowered my stress levels resulting in fewer crashes, and I was able to manage listening to my girlfriend calling me a loser and to get a life while flying. heheh.
    hNz2r5I.jpg?width=320
    I hacked open the cheap controller, and desoldered the crappy antenna inside there. I added RG316 cable with an already soldered plug on the end. This allowed me to use a more powerful antenna.
    6T2Za8m.jpg?width=320
    Like this black rectangular wifi antenna.
    VyCDlAV.jpg?width=320
    So, now I am happy that I am actually flying. I can improve the quadcopter handling by swapping the 808 #16 camera with a small security-style spy camera module which uses 3.7v weighing 2grammes. This can reduce weight load by a massive 15grammes, allowing a slightly larger transmitter battery to be used, or possibly an OSD module like below.
    I am also aware that WlToys have released a more 'balanced' quadcopter called the v212. Which, has an accelerometer as well as the gyroscope to assist in levelling during flight, preventing wind from blowing it over, and correcting errors. I even hear you can throw it in the air and it will correct itself ready to fly. Also, this week WlToys have released the v262, a larger quadcopter that seems to allow up to 100grammes of lift. This would allow you to use a mini fpv camera that we made with the 2gram camera, and also the 808 #16 camera to record video, from different angles such as, from the rear of the quad. That might leave more weight allowance for experiments with a mini servo gimbal rig for the 808 camera.
    Progression on this project could be to hack the quadcopter circuit board, and add a digital compass and barometer like they have in mobile phones running 3.7v. This could mean you can then measure altitude and direction, and possible make a switch to hold altitude, and set heading.
    Once the above has been achieved,you could also integrate a small 3.7v OSD (onscreen display):
    7x1alit.jpg
    Which could show you flight time/voltage left, altitude, gyroscopic yaw, compass measurements etc..
    Another possibility, could be to attach a RaspberryPi tiny computer to the back of the monitor, and program an Augmented Reality game that could blast aliens, shoot balloons, or fly through rings.
    Now wouldn't that be fun?
    And you will have made it all yourself :)
Read more…

Arducopter 3.0.1 Large Heli Demo

I just did a quick demo video to show Arducopter 3.0.1 flying a large electric heli.  This is my new GreyHawk Maxi development frame.  Loosely based on TRex 550 mechanics, stretched to 700 size, and with a direct drive tail rotor motor.  The DD Tail gets rid of a lot of unreliable, noisy, vibrating geartrain.  The heli is very smooth and you can hear the blades instead of gears screaming.  In person, it's actually eerily quiet, if there's a wind out, you can barely hear it from a few hundred feet away.

This video is pretty tame.  But I wanted to show how stable the and precise Arducopter can be.  Normally I shoot test video in worst-case conditions, but most marketing videos are done to show perfect performance, so here you go.

This is only my 4th flight on this new heli, and I'm still getting it dialed in.  Alt Hold has absolutely no problem at all with the Asymmetric rotor blades.

This video is also the first appearance of the DD Motor control feature which should be coming out with 3.1.  The motor control for the tail motor comes out of Ch7.  The setpoint can be changed in MP, independently of the main motor setpoint. And it can be started before the main motor, or held on after the main motor is off (auto-gyro flight).  One very nice feature of this system is that you can have different flight modes on the main rotor, low speed and high speed, but the tail motor retains a set speed, even with a very low main rotor speed, so you retain tail authority.

Read more…

First flight with the GoPro attached

 

3689539040?profile=original

I'm pleased to report that after an initial successful flight at Easter I have my plane back in the air (helped by finding somewhere in London to fly it), this time with the full weight of the GoPro and corresponding ballast attached.

Its a stock EasyStar with added CF in the wing spars and up the tail to strengthen it, with the addition of APM2.5+3DR and a GoPro hung at the root of the port wing. To balance some lead shot is in the starboard wing towards the tip.

It went up for six or seven flights trying to dial in the PIDs, immediately obvious was how sluggish and wind affected it was. I think it may be underpowered now as I had to spend quite a lot of time at full throttle but this might simply be the lack of finesse that comes with lack of experience. 

I was running the EasyStar PIDs from the wiki as a starting place although I wasn't pleased with how these responded. The roll was accurate but sluggish and turn performance under auto was very slow, possibly down to low bank angle. 

Pitch wasn't much better even in manual, I had to up the servo travel limits before I got a sensible amount of elevator control.

I increased the roll P gain a couple of clicks and managed to get the wings wagging but the EasyStar file includes quite a bit of I gain which none of the other config files use. If the wind stays calm I'm going to take it out again today with a blank canvas, no I or D gain and dial in the P from scratch, then the D and finally a little bit of I. 

A great positive I can take from this is there is almost no vibration on the camera despite no efforts to damp it. I just stuck it to the bottom of the wing with a sticky pad. Because my ambitions for this plane is mostly aerial topography the camera position is optimised for looking straight down but for one video I pointed the camera ahead. This was the last run of the day with the plane following a square pattern. It didn't really follow it very well but we can work on the details! 

YouTube

Read more…
3D Robotics

3689539015?profile=originalScott Pham, from the Missouri Drones Journalism Program, has a great piece in Mashable about his sobering experience in the state legislature trying to fight misinformation about drone use:

Excerpt:

In just five years from now, 7,500 licensed unmanned aircrafts — commonly known as drones — will fly the skies above United States soil. By 2030, there will be 30,000.

However, these numbers are conservative. At this very moment, the popular drone hobbyist community DIY Drones boasts 40,000 members. Drones are not the technology of some unknown future. They are a fact of our lives.

That is why, when I received a request to attend a state legislative hearing for a bill to virtually ban all drone flight in the state, the whole thing felt a little ridiculous.

My colleagues and I started the Missouri Drone Journalism Program late last year to figure out if and how journalists could tell compelling stories with these small, unmanned flying vehicles.

We were by no means the first to consider using drones for journalistic purposes; I drew inspiration from forerunners like Matthew Waite at the University of Nebraska, who established one of the very first programs for investigating the use of these battery-powered aircrafts in journalism.

While the willingness to tread new waters in news coverage was admirable, the early efforts were missing an essential element: content. And isn't that the whole point?

The most obvious journalistic use for drones is to cover events that pose extreme obstacles — public protests, crime and natural disasters — for photojournalists on land. But documenting those kinds of phenomena requires advanced technology and skills that we could not develop in a short period of time. Moreover, it’s nearly impossible to cover most of those stories under current FAA regulations.

Instead, my program focused on stories around agriculture and the environment on public lands. The footage might not be epic, but it was feasible to capture, and it was the best defense against the skeptics. 

Prove these machines can be used for good, and the public's doubts would subside ... or so I thought.

I deeply underestimated the skeptics. The trouble started early, when we were getting attention from blogs and newspapers. After an interview, one television reporter alerted us to something we missed: The Missouri General Assembly was considering a bill that would ban the use of drones by most people.

Like a lot of legislation in the Midwest, Missouri House Bill 46 started as a reaction to a misunderstood piece of news. (That year, Missouri would also try to outlaw the United Nation’s “Agenda 21.”)

Rumors had been circling conservative blogs that the EPA was using drones to spy on feedlots in Nebraska. (For the record, those claims have been thoroughly debunked.) In response, Republican Representative Casey Guernsey crafted a bill that would prevent just about anyone but police from using drones.

It’s easy to imagine the reporter’s glee when he had the opportunity to be the very first person to tell the Representative about my program.

“You’ve got to be kidding me,” said Guernsey in the interview. “That's enormously disturbing.”

Guernsey’s staff asked me to attend an early hearing at the General Assembly’s Agri-Business committee, which Guernsey happened to chair. I watched as the Representative — a young, slim man just a few years older than myself — went through the procedures of opening the hearing. He then awkwardly walked around the legislator’s seating to the other side of the room where he sat at a desk and explained his support for HB 46.

I was shocked to hear him actually recount the rumors of the EPA drones. When one of the few Democrats on the committee pressed him on whether he was certain the EPA was using drones, Guernsey only offered, “It was all anyone was talking about back home.”

Read the rest here.

Read more…

About my ride from the sUSB EXPO

3689538993?profile=original

So I catch a Sidecar ride after the fantastic sUSB EXPO, and the driver and I are chatting about civilian drones. He totally gets the good things that can be done for agriculture, the environment, and other purposes.

As I am about to step out of the car he says: Maybe they could be called Zero Occupancy Vehicles! After we laughed about it, I offered to give him credit but he declined.

Doug Starwalt and I thought the DIY Drones community might have some fun with this. A very quick Google search didn't reveal issues (but you never know without extensive research). Anyway, we wanted to put this out there.

Cheers! from JohnG at dronespeak.com

Read more…