All Posts (14048)
system, with the Multi-Remote system you can control 7 Remote switches
at the same time, plus its very easy to use. You just need 1 spare
channel on your receiver and the system controls 9 different outputs.
Specifications:
Input voltage: 6~12V
Weight: 15g
Price is US$ 9.94 and it is available from Hobbyking
The appearance i mean not bad but still not a uav it's a cookie cooker image.
Now that i got that out of my system let's move on. If you have not read my previous blog i suggest you do.
I recently sold my gaui 330x original version but i needed something to fly not too pricey and spare parts ready available. until i find a u-3d- ufo with funpilot too buy at a 30 percent savings. I decided to buy the walkera ufo 5 about 169.00 plus shipping. I was pleasantly surprised with this quadcopter it's easy to fly, very stable and excellent for beginners and i mean excellent. Unlike the advertising pros who trick consumer in to buying something that is marketed for beginner and is not ,leaving the consumer's pocket feeling a bit lighter.
The pros: Very easy to fly and stable, a good design, spare parts are easy to find,affordable and can be flown indoor , outside on calm days and it is pretty durable. The cons: Medium power ,the motor are brushed.
Oh and getting back to the appearance of the copter well i made a few changes and very soon i am doing the propeller mod. I had to make it look like a real quadcopter I thought the original appearance of the copter looked a little cheesy.
I've finally perfected the X-Plane HIL for Ardupilot. This will be a feature on 2.6.3 which will be in beta today.
Flying Waypoints:
Here is missed waypoint detection: (I nudged the plane at the last second with the radio to miss the WPs.)
Here is fully auto take off and landing:
Here is the video of auto takeoff and landing:
Xplane and Ardupilot from Jason Short on Vimeo.
If you want to try this out you have to use some software to glue this all together.
Serproxy - used to talk serial to Ardupilot
Perl - to link Serproxy and X-Plane using "X-Plane.pl"
X-Plane 9 (the free version works fine, but it time limited)
I've only tested this on a Mac, so if anyone can try this on a PC, please let me know of changes to make, if any.
In the config header you will see a new ground station called GCS_Xplane (3). You must also use GPS_protocol 3 for ArduIMU.
Here is the Perl file:X-Plane.pl
Here is Windows Serproxy - Windows
Here is Mac Serproxy - Mac
in the config set:
newlines_to_nils=true
comm_baud=38400
Then set the com port accordingly
Go ahead and download 2.6.3 from the SVN. I'll post a beta soon as a download.
Moving forward I'd like to replace the Perl/Serproxy combination with a single C or Python based solution. If anyone can help, that would make it so much easier to set up!
Bonus:
From Hizook.com: Gliding UAV Perches on a Wire -- Power Line Recharging to Follow
Perching is one of the most common aerobatic maneuvers executed by birds and is representative of a large and important class of aggressive aerial maneuvers that take advantage of unsteady aerodynamics. During a perching maneuver, birds often exceed 90 degrees in angle-of-attack, exploiting both viscous and pressure drag for rapid deceleration. Russ Tedrake and Rick Cory at MIT's Robot Locomotion Group have drawn inspiration from these insane maneuvers by developing a gliding UAV that can perform perching -- eventually (presumably) allowing a UAV to perch and recharge on powerlines. This is an impressive feat on many levels: the physics (semi-turbulent flow, visualized in their photos), a controls perspective (dealing with high-speed maneuvers, non-linear dynamics, and real-time constraints), and an application perspective (the eventual integration of powerline recharging). Be sure to check out the photos and videos!
Here you are some photographs of my flying robot.
It's a chinese replica of the t rex 450 equipped with brushless motor and lipo battery.
As you can see, there's a CMUcam mounted in the front. It points the helicopter in the direction (yaw control) of a coloured object, and follows it when this ascends or descends, lowering and raising height.
The new arduPilot mega with IMU shield is mounted on the tail boom, near the body. Currently it works just as a stabilization unit with little code modifications. In the future, when I'll have some spare time, I'll adapt it as an autopilot with gps guide and indoor navigation techniques such as the Polly algorithm (CMUcam software) which recognizes wall edges.
The goal of this project is to demonstrate (or not!) that cheap electronics and models can lead to a "successful" and reliable robot, to use as a platform for sensors.
in particular, the major goals to achieve are:
-long flight time
-payload weight
-almost absolutely fail-safe hardware and software, reliability
-autonomous navigation
upgrades can be a controller such as the RoBoard, the roboRealm vision software and a camera
I'll post more as soon (long) as i have time to work
cheeeeeers
You can find the udates here:
Futaba Updates
"Environment:
- New file extension to replace the .pde borrowed from Processing (issue #13).
- Redesigned toolbar icons (issue #291).
- Ability to upload sketches using an in-system programmer (ISP) from the IDE (issue #260).
- Simplifying the process of selecting your board and serial port (issues #223 and #257).
- Command-line compilation and uploading of sketches (issue #124).
Language (most of these are possibilities and still open for discussion):
- Creating events that can be called automatically, e.g. the serialEvent() as in Processing (issue #263).
- Adding specific functions for enabling / disabling the internal pullup resistors (issue #246).
- Modifying the behavior of print() on bytes (issue #284).
- Functions for accessing more of the low-level functionality of the hardware timers and other peripherals (issues #169 and #248).
- Optimizing the digitalWrite() function (issue #140)."
Massimo Banzi
Four pick-and-place machines work all day making Arduino boards in a small factory in the farm country between Milan and Turin, in the small electronics company cluster that's around the old Olivetti factory. Most of these companies used to be suppliers for Olivetti, but when it went out of the PC business and was sold to Telecom Italia, they became more entrepreneurial electronics firms. Now they are bringing high-tech electronics manufacturing back from China.
These women load the bootloader and run the tests.
She packs boards
We're not in Kansas anymore! The Arduino factory's squat toilet.
The PCBs are fabbed in another small factory down the road from the Arduino factory.
The boards are dipped in chemicals to remove the resist
Lots of stirring to get the chemicals to etch the board correctly
The slowest and most expensive part of the PCB process is drilling the vias.
This is the design shop where the next-gen Arduino boards are being developed.
I just read a great post by Bill Sweetman on Aviation Week's Ares Blog about a publication of The Mitchell Institute over the history of UAVs in the US armed forces.
The author is Dr. Thomas P. Ehrhard and although I haven't finished reading it yet it certainly is very interesting.
You can download the full document (88 page pdf) here: Air Force UAVs: The Secret History
(in the photo one of the concepts covered on the document, the D-21B)
Excerpt from the New Scientist article: "While several research groups around the world have demonstrated flapping machines, wing design can be hit or miss because it's hard to get your head around the physics, says Lipson. This is where 3D printers come in – by shedding light on flight dynamics they could be an important step towards the development of smaller and more efficient wings, say Lipson and his colleague Charlie Richter.
What's so special about 3D printers? They make it possible to create complex structures, such as wings that are warped to improve performance, like the manually curved wings of a paper aeroplane, says Richter. Their printer is capable of producing features just 16 micrometres wide, and thin films just 40 micrometres thick.
The other advantage of printing is speed, says Lipson. Once they have arrived at a new wing design, printing a set takes under an hour. With the exception of its motor and battery, their latest four-winged creation is almost entirely printed from polyester films stretched over carbon fibre rods, and weighs in at just 3.89 grams – a six-fold weight reduction on their previous version – and capable of hovering untethered for up to 85 seconds.
Hi. I have made some modifications to the MatrixPilot code to do tests on In flight tunable gain. If this is further refined, it will be possible to do tuning of P/D gains on roll, pitch and yaw axis while in flight. The idea is that the gains can be tuned with a spare button on your RC transmitter one after the other (separately) while you fly the plane in stabilized mode. The gain you want to tune is gradually increased until oscillation is seen at max desired airspeed and then reduced back somewhat to ensure stability on that axis with that gain. My code mods is a hack at the moment, but this is just to illustrate the concept.
I haven't heard much talk about Jasons sim which is strange because the more I use it the more I realise how good it is.
It is certainly the best tool to use when building your own gcs. Auto mode works brilliantly and "fly by wire" is a bit of fun. The sim automatically returns to base and then loiters once all the way points have been reached. Switching back to "auto" mode starts the sim again.
Below you can see the turns which the sim produced. The telemetry included the correct lat, lng, pitch, roll, climb rate, and speed
Tomorrow night we'll do podcast #27, which everyone here is welcome to participate in by listening to the chat live above and commenting and asking questions via the DIY Drones chat function. We'll be starting at 9:00 PM PST and will probably go about 40 minutes.
This week we'll by joined by Richard Hanson, who the AMA's Regulatory and Governmental Affairs operations. The regulatory process to introduce UAVs in the National Airspace (NAS) is a long, tortured and potentially disastrous ordeal for us. If it goes well, we'll be given guidelines or laws under which to operate, which create a category for small amateur UAVs that allows us to operate safely and still do interesting work. If it doesn't go well, we could be banned entirely.
Want to see what we're up against? Check out this thread, by another AMA official: Excerpt: "At one time our feelings and direction were to try to leave modeling under AMA as close to status quo as possible....In fact the words that were used were "To regulate model aviation by exempting it from regulation". I am fairly certain that idea is no longer valid!"
Rich's job is to ensure that model aircraft continue to have a place in the NAS, while allowing the hobby to move forward as technology allows. So far the AMA hasn't allowed UAVs on its airfields, but it has allowed FPV under certain conditions. We'll be talking to Rich about how it's going and what we can do to help.
As always you can subscribe to the podcast here. Tonight's livecast will be recorded and available as a podcast by Tues of the next week.
Another great run by Brian Wolfe with his custom PicPilot autopilot, and he wins Round 7 of the T3 competition--the autonomous takeoff and landing round! Second place goes to Mark Griffin (Paparazzi), Third to William Premerlani (UAVDevBoard), followed by Riccardo Kuebler (UAVDevBoard) and Krzysztof Bosak (EasyUAV).
This was a tough round--not all autopilots can do autonomous takeoff and landing--so hats off to the winners. They're all real UAV pros, as shown by their consistent high performance in multiple T3 Rounds.
I'll announce the next round this weekend, and it should be a bit easier (and fun!) to encourage lots of entries. Plus it's summer--what else do you have to do??
Full list of winners and standing after 7 rounds below. Huge thanks to our judge, Gary Mortimer, who has handled the difficult task of reviewing and grading the entries (requiring the smarts of Einstein and wisdom of Solomon) with charm, good humor and constant encouragement. We couldn't do it without you, Gary!
Made a 19 Km 28 minute flight and made a video using 3 onboard cameras.
The mission was 10 Km but de wind and missing waypoints added 5 Km
the other 4 Km was flight time before and after the mission.
Setup was the same as the 7 Km flight;
http://www.diydrones.com/xn/detail/705844:BlogPost:175965?xg_source=activity
It's time to return to where we 1st envisioned having a UAV & enact the vision seen 22 years ago with real hardware.
In 1988, intended to have a manually flown, solar powered quad rotor which flew over the East Bay hills to our 1st love & provided telepresense. Still not possible to this day, but part the vision involving hovering near the school can be realized.
There it is. The vision has finally been made real.
This is where we had the 1st ideas & drew the 1st pictures of what would 1 day be a practical UAV.
But all good things come to an end, with pride.
Forgot to screw in the servo horn.